Methodological tools for studying stress and personal performance in a work environment
Abstract
This article examines the methodological tools for researching the relationships between stress, personal performance, and work environment dynamics. It explores the use of standardized questionnaires, additional survey instruments, and empirical methodologies to analyze factors influencing workplace stress and individual productivity. The findings provide insights into how stress impacts employees and highlight strategies for optimizing personal performance.
References
2. Cortes ML et al. Association between perceived stress and health-risk behaviours in workers. Psychol. Heal. Med. 2020. doi:10.1080/13548506.2020.1859567
3. Csikszentmihalyi, M., 2002. Flow: The Psychology of Optimal Experience. New York: Harper Perennial.
4. Cohen, S., Kamarck, T. and Mermelstein, R., 1983. A global measure of perceived stress. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 24(4), pp. 385-396.
5. Salanova, M., Bakker, A.B. and Llorens, S., 2006. Flow at work: Evidence for an upward spiral of personal and organizational resources. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 68(1), pp. 1-17.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
By submitting a paper for publishing the authors hereby comply with the following provisions: 1. The authors retain the copyrights and only give the journal the right for first publication while licensing the work under Creative Commons Attribution License, which grants permissions to others to share the contribution citing this journal as first publication of the text. 2. The authors may enter separate, additional contractual relations for non-exclusive distribution of the published version of the work in this journal (e.g. to upload it in an institutional depository, or to be published in a book), given that they cite the first publication in this journal. 3. The authors are allowed and are encouraged to publish their works online (e.g. to upload it in an institutional depository, personal websites, social networks, etc.) before, during, and after the submission of the paper here, because this may lead to productive exchange, as well as earlier and larger referencing of the published works (see The Effect of Open Access).
